On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Nicholas Guarracino wrote: >> is there persistence on the backup director? > > Yes, ipvs is using persistence on both servers. Or do you > mean the sync daemon?
sorry, I was ambiguous. On the backup director, when it's receiving updates from the syncd on the master director, do you see the persistence flag? Come to think of it, I don't know if the persistence on the backup director comes from the synchd updates or from running ipvsadm when the backup becomes the master :-( > Initially I was thinking that no persistence would be > needed at all for the SH scheduler, but it looks like > that's not the case since I'm assuming the list of > available realservers could be filled in any order? This was my reservation when I mentioned the -SH scheduler. I don't know what would happen there and I expect noone's tried it. > I did see some of the updates you mentioned. They seemed > mostly related to highly loaded systems, and instead of > sleeping for a fixed amount of time, waking up whenever > there is data to process. I doubt those changes would help > here since I only have two clients connected, but a later > kernel is definitely worth trying. I wasn't real hopeful of anything in there being the cure, but if you could reproduce the problem with a recent kernel, it would save us tracking down a problem that was solved long ago, even if then it wasn't showing the symptoms you've got now. Joe -- Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux! _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
