Hello Greame, On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:37:30 +0100 Graeme Fowler wrote: > I appreciate that this isn't going to fix things for you right now, but > there is work going on as I type to extend IPVS into IPv6 territory. > There's also some considerable work under way to clean up the existing > code, make it more self-consistent, and fix several possible > races/deadlocks at the same time. > > If you can offer some advice, guidance, or coding time then your problem > is more likely to "fix" itself (your quotes) much more quickly. > If I could code myself out of a wet paper bag in C, yes. This also goes for Joe's comment on "you could do it yourself". ^_^ And unfortunately none of the "resources" (read, coworkers) I could commandeer here are kernel hackers either. > Unfortunately there's no real timeframe for this, but be assured that it > is happening - check the archives here (and the associated pages): > > http://archive.linuxvirtualserver.org/html/lvs-devel/ > Thanks a bundle for this URL and the progress being made I was able to gleam from it. Last time I remember IPV6 being mentioned in this ML the general tune and outlook was pretty bleak.
Regards, Christian -- Christian Balzer Network/Systems Engineer NOC [EMAIL PROTECTED] Global OnLine Japan/Fusion Network Services http://www.gol.com/ https://secure3.gol.com/mod-pl/ols/index.cgi/?intr_id=F-2ECXvzcr6656 _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
