On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 15:46 +0900, Christian Balzer wrote: > On the other hand (and I seriously don't want to come across as a fountain > of negative vibes, but I do realize I probably am) this problem is likely > to "fix" itself within the next 18 months when I will be forced to support > IPV6 and thus having to look for some other load balancing solution (and I > really really like IPVS, I seriously do).
I appreciate that this isn't going to fix things for you right now, but there is work going on as I type to extend IPVS into IPv6 territory. There's also some considerable work under way to clean up the existing code, make it more self-consistent, and fix several possible races/deadlocks at the same time. If you can offer some advice, guidance, or coding time then your problem is more likely to "fix" itself (your quotes) much more quickly. Unfortunately there's no real timeframe for this, but be assured that it is happening - check the archives here (and the associated pages): http://archive.linuxvirtualserver.org/html/lvs-devel/ Graeme _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
