I'm using LVS-NAT, from the documentation is says its based on cisco's
LocalDirector.
Goal is to basically remove the antiquated LocalDirector (has been
discontinued a while ago), and replace it with LVS-NAT. However, the real
servers in the current configuration do not use the local director as their
gateway, they use the firewall which is on the same subnet.
[Internet] ----> [Firewall] (172.16.1.1) ---> [Local Director] (172.16.1.5)
----> {Switch} ----> [Real Server] (172.16.1.55)
The real servers gateway is 172.16.1.1,
I understand why the real server would need the LVS-NAT as its gateway, but
im looking for a solution that can just replace the LocalDirector, is
LVS-NAT not what I'm looking for?
Thanks,
Kyle
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected]
Send requests to [email protected]
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
