LVS-NAT requires the Director to be its Gateway. I think you are looking for LVS-DR. That should do what you need.
Good luck! -Philip On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:52 AM, devnull <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm using LVS-NAT, from the documentation is says its based on cisco's > LocalDirector. > > Goal is to basically remove the antiquated LocalDirector (has been > discontinued a while ago), and replace it with LVS-NAT. However, the real > servers in the current configuration do not use the local director as their > gateway, they use the firewall which is on the same subnet. > > [Internet] ----> [Firewall] (172.16.1.1) ---> [Local Director] (172.16.1.5) > ----> {Switch} ----> [Real Server] (172.16.1.55) > > The real servers gateway is 172.16.1.1, > > I understand why the real server would need the LVS-NAT as its gateway, but > im looking for a solution that can just replace the LocalDirector, is > LVS-NAT not what I'm looking for? > > Thanks, > > > Kyle > _______________________________________________ > Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: > http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ > > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] > Send requests to [email protected] > or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users > _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [email protected] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
