Kyle, It sounds like your localdirector is in bridging mode (servers physically wired through the cisco box to the router?)
http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.transparent_bridging.html LVS doesn't really support it (although Barracuda got it working somehow). Either try DR as previously suggested or change your topology for NAT. Or possibly single network (one-arm) NAT (requires routing change on the servers). 2009/10/21 devnull <[email protected]> > > > [Internet] ----> [Firewall] (172.16.1.1) ---> [Local Director] (172.16.1.5) > ----> {Switch} ----> [Real Server] (172.16.1.55) > > The real servers gateway is 172.16.1.1, > > I understand why the real server would need the LVS-NAT as its gateway, but > im looking for a solution that can just replace the LocalDirector, is > LVS-NAT not what I'm looking for? > -- Regards, Malcolm Turnbull. Loadbalancer.org Ltd. Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779 http://www.loadbalancer.org/ _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [email protected] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
