On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 16:09 +0200, [email protected] wrote: > I haven't yet understood why we have fatal errors at all: If the user > (application) wants the stack to retry, why not? All that fatal error > handling only leads to errors noone understands, anyway... And all > that > only because we want to prevent running some code when we *suspect* > we > had a fatal error and it would go wrong later?
I hadn't considered getting rid of them altogether, but you make a good case for it. Interestingly, CVS says you added the ERR_IS_FATAL macro so if you don't understand what they're for, I'm guessing that no one does! Kieran _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
