I will try to find the IRC log about this discussion to know the reasons (it should be in my home computer). I know it was in "[task #6969] Review usage of conn->err in netconn layer" if it can help...
http://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?6969 > Message du 07/10/09 11:56 > De : "Simon Goldschmidt" > A : "Mailing list for lwIP users" > Copie à : > Objet : Re: [lwip-users] link down and netconn problem > > > > I hadn't considered getting rid of them altogether, but you make a good > > case for it. Interestingly, CVS says you added the ERR_IS_FATAL macro > > so if you don't understand what they're for, I'm guessing that no one > > does! > > That was after a discussion with Frédéric, who did not agree that no errors > are fatal. I think before that, we did not have non-fatal errors at all > (meaning there were checkes for conn->err == ERR_OK at some places) and as I > did not convince him, we added the 'fatal' check as a consensus. However, I'm > still not totally satisfied with this solution... > > Simon > -- > GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! > Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01 > > > _______________________________________________ > lwip-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Laposte.net fête ses 10 ans ! Gratuite, garantie à vie et déjà utilisée par des millions d'internautes... vous aussi, pour votre adresse e-mail, choisissez laposte.net. Laposte.net, bien + qu'une messagerie ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
