> I hadn't considered getting rid of them altogether, but you make a good > case for it. Interestingly, CVS says you added the ERR_IS_FATAL macro > so if you don't understand what they're for, I'm guessing that no one > does!
That was after a discussion with Frédéric, who did not agree that no errors are fatal. I think before that, we did not have non-fatal errors at all (meaning there were checkes for conn->err == ERR_OK at some places) and as I did not convince him, we added the 'fatal' check as a consensus. However, I'm still not totally satisfied with this solution... Simon -- GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01 _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
