I meant of course the total UDP datagram size, not the number of IP packets inside.
From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [lwip-users] lwip 1.4.1 bug-fix release Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:45:23 +0000 Simon, I was talking about IPv4 fragmentation (and may be IP options). The document i read mentioned it is not implemented yet, but it seems the document is out of dated. So now-days, is there any limitations on UDP/IPv4 implementation regarding the standard ? How many IP fragments are supported in a single UDP ? up to 32K, 64K ? Thanks, Stas Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 21:21:57 +0100 From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [lwip-users] lwip 1.4.1 bug-fix release Zayaz Volk wrote: I am wondering, if there is a forecast for introducing fragmented udp support ? IPv4 fragmentation and reassembly is already supported (since I don't know when). What are you missing? Simon _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
_______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
