Zayaz Volk wrote: > On other hand, if UDP checksum is omitted and under certain > conditions (long UDP datagram timeout, high communcation speed and as > a result IP overlapping while still within a UDP datagram timeout) - > one might expect to get a wrong, but "valid" datagram with IP > fragment belonging to another UDP datagram. - I think, it might > happen with IPv4.
Attributing fragments of one datagram to a different datagram would definitely be a bug in the network stack. That's the purpose of the Identification field. (and Fragment Offset to a lesser degree.) -- Regards. _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
