Hi Tero, Zhen, This document defines a stripped-down IPSec IKEv2, could such a document be informational?
Why has RSA been kept? Regards, Behcet On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Cao Zhen (CZ) <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear All, > > The draft has been updated and now there is a new version of it: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kivinen-ipsecme-ikev2-minimal-01.txt. > > This email starts a call for adoption of the draft. Please feedback in one > week from now. > > Thanks and regards, > Zhen & Robert > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Cao Zhen (CZ) >> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 9:43 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: [Lwip] Call for adoption of > draft-kivinen-ipsecme-ikev2-minimal-00 >> >> Dear All, >> >> During IETF84th meeting at Vancouver, several people spoke for the > adoption of >> draft-kivinen-ipsecme-ikev2-minimal-00 >> (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kivinen-ipsecme-ikev2-minimal-00). This > draft is related >> to the LWIG working group and covered by the charter, and was presented as > once in the >> working group. >> >> This email is to confirm the consensus of adoption of this document. > Please feedback in one >> week from now, i.e., before Sept 24, 2012, 5PM PDT, >> >> Thanks and regards, >> Zhen & Robert >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lwip mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip > > _______________________________________________ > Lwip mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip _______________________________________________ Lwip mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
