On Oct 3, 2012, at 17:38, Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]> wrote:

> This document defines a stripped-down IPSec IKEv2, could such a
> document be informational?

I understand this as a minimal profile of IPsec, not as a "stripped-down" 
(which I would read as "non-conforming") protocol.
The intention is to show implementers how IPsec can be made to work on 
constrained platforms, not to define a new protocol.
This is a typical LWIG style document.
(If there is a bug in how this was done and the result indeed is not 
interoperable, we certainly can fix this in the WG process.
If we need to spin off some standards-track work to make an interoperable 
constrained implementation worthwhile, we can also spin it off.)

> Why has RSA been kept?

Good question, but maybe again something we can discuss in the WG process.

Grüße, Carsten

_______________________________________________
Lwip mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip

Reply via email to