On Oct 3, 2012, at 17:38, Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]> wrote:
> This document defines a stripped-down IPSec IKEv2, could such a > document be informational? I understand this as a minimal profile of IPsec, not as a "stripped-down" (which I would read as "non-conforming") protocol. The intention is to show implementers how IPsec can be made to work on constrained platforms, not to define a new protocol. This is a typical LWIG style document. (If there is a bug in how this was done and the result indeed is not interoperable, we certainly can fix this in the WG process. If we need to spin off some standards-track work to make an interoperable constrained implementation worthwhile, we can also spin it off.) > Why has RSA been kept? Good question, but maybe again something we can discuss in the WG process. Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ Lwip mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
