> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Tero Kivinen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Behcet Sarikaya writes: > >> This document defines a stripped-down IPSec IKEv2, could such a > >> document be informational? > > > > This is just summary of the minimal features of the IKEv2. Only thing > > we do change from the actual IKEv2 specification is that we do remove > > the requirement for support for certificates. > > So there is some normative change. > Put it another way, that it is recommended in the document that lightweight implementation of Ikev2 SHOULD not use the certification based authentication. That's informational.
So I believe the document fits into information overall. _______________________________________________ Lwip mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
