Sure. We started that discussion a few IETFs ago and have a bis draft out at draft-bormann-lwig-7228bis.
(I’m not sure that I will be in Chicago, but I could join from remote.) One thing that needs to be added before even discussing these device classes is the difference between micro controllers (which you have been calling M-class) and general purpose computing platforms (A-class). Proposed text for that should be in the next version of 7228bis. Grüße, Carsten > On 25 Jan 2017, at 23:12, Hannes Tschofenig <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7228#section-3 defines these three > classes of IoT devices: > > +-------------+-----------------------+-------------------------+ > | Name | data size (e.g., RAM) | code size (e.g., Flash) | > +-------------+-----------------------+-------------------------+ > | Class 0, C0 | << 10 KiB | << 100 KiB | > | | | | > | Class 1, C1 | ~ 10 KiB | ~ 100 KiB | > | | | | > | Class 2, C2 | ~ 50 KiB | ~ 250 KiB | > +-------------+-----------------------+-------------------------+ > > Is there an interest to get together at the next IETF meeting and to > talk about re-working on these classes and to provide more details about > the functionality that is included in this calculation based on ongoing > implementation work? > > Ciao > Hannes > > _______________________________________________ > Lwip mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip _______________________________________________ Lwip mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
