Emmanuel Baccelli <[email protected]> wrote: > concerning "motes", "class 0", or whatever we want to call such > devices: > indeed, not sure how we should relate with such devices in the > document.
> Do we care to define a "new" category of devices on which no protocol
> will run that we IETFers specify (e.g. BLE beacons)?
> I'd say: no, unless it is deemed useful to distinguish from other
> types of devices
> that are expected to run IETF protocols in practice.
I say, "yes".
It's useful to be able to say, "dude, that's a class 0 device! You can't make
IPv6 work there, stop trying: you are breaking important functionality"
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Lwip mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
