I did a quick read of the draft and to me its not clear what the goal of
clause 5.2 "Class of Internet Integration" is.
The table talks about internet technologies, the text makes reference to
communications patterns (e.g. device-to-cloud) whereas the section is on
integration. It also lists I9 which seems to suggest there will be
"degrees" on classes of integration between I1 and I9.
So is the aim to only have 3 types? e.g.
Device Internal IP usage - IP Interoperability not an issue.
Device to Provider Server - IP Interoperability within a service provider.
Device to Any - IP interoperability required between multiple service
providers.
Or to have something more specific to IP listing what parts of the IP
suite are supported?
Regards, Christian
On 26/01/2017 6:57 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
On 26 Jan 2017, at 00:38, Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote:
Sure. We started that discussion a few IETFs ago and have a bis draft out at
draft-bormann-lwig-7228bis.
… and the editors’ draft is now at:
https://github.com/lwig-wg/terminology
and
https://lwig-wg.github.io/terminology/
Issues and pull requests are welcome.
(Please see https://github.com/lwig-wg/terminology/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md
).
(The proposed bis document is an individual submission at this point; we still
put it up under the “lwig-wg” organization as there appears to be some
interest.)
Grüße, Carsten
_______________________________________________
Lwip mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
_______________________________________________
Lwip mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
