Hi Michael, On 02/01/2017 07:32 PM, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Hannes Tschofenig <[email protected]> wrote: > > I agree with Emmanuel regarding the difference between the device that > > run a RTOS (or special IoT-designed OS) and the devices that run a > > general purpose OS, like Linux. This is also a differentiation we make, > > as you know. > > And there is also some sub-classes of "Linux" that are relevant.
I personally care less about those sub-categories since I can map these class 1 devices to Cortex M class processors and class 2 devices to Cortex A class processors. For Intel, there are similar categories. > > > PS: I am not sure about the "motes". Are you talking about BLE beacons? > > It's a good example. But really anything that basically can never be field > upgraded. I guess I am fine calling them class 0 devices that are basically outside our scope since they do not run IP. Ciao Hannes > > > -- > Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works > -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Lwip mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Lwip mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
