On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 04:57:10PM -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Christian Seiler (christ...@iwakd.de): > > Hi Serge, > > > > > Thanks, Christian - I've pushed a new patch to github on top of yours. > > > Regular start/stop/lxc-cgroup stuff is working for me both with all > > > cgroups composed and separately mounted. > > > > I can confirm that it works on my setup. > > > > I do have a very stupid question, however: LXC 0.9 used to set the > > cgroup to /lxc/$name. Now it's just /$name. Is that intentional? > > Hm, it was somewhat unconscious but I didn't really mean to do that. > Some cgroup subsystems do incur a performance penalty for every > extra directory we descend. But /lxc does make for a nice grouping. > > Do you (and others) have a preference? Should we stick with /lxc? > > -serge
Having /lxc makes it much easier to sett what's part of a container vs what's part of a user session or whatever else uses cgroups these days. -- Stéphane Graber Ubuntu developer http://www.ubuntu.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Introducing Performance Central, a new site from SourceForge and AppDynamics. Performance Central is your source for news, insights, analysis and resources for efficient Application Performance Management. Visit us today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897511&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ Lxc-devel mailing list Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel
