Hi Serge,
> If we're going to do this, we should do it soon. Would you have time
> in the next few days?
Define 'few'. ;) I should be able to do that until Monday (barring any
emergencies).
> (BTW, if we're going to throw words like b0rked around, I'd prefer to
> reserve that for the refusal to implement fake-root in cgroups itself
> which would allow us to ignore this by treating ourselves as really
> being inside '/')
Sorry, I didn't mean any insult by that. But yes, virtualized cgroups
would obviously be the best solution.[tm]
Two technical questions:
1. What about the naming convention? Stick with /lxc/$name or go with
/machine/$name.lxc (see prev. email)? Or I could make that
configurable?
2. Any objections to implementing the mountcgroups hook in C?
Especially if I want to do the cgroup mount point detection right
(and not just assume /sys/fs/cgroup) it is going to be a huge pain
to do that in shell, whereas in C I could reuse code.
-- Christian
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introducing Performance Central, a new site from SourceForge and
AppDynamics. Performance Central is your source for news, insights,
analysis and resources for efficient Application Performance Management.
Visit us today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897511&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Lxc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel
