Hi Mario,

I haven't got a login to the blog system yet.

-Andrew

Mario Behling wrote:
> It would also be good, if we could announce new releases in the blog
> generally. If anybody of the release team has not got a login to the
> blog yet, please let me know.
> 
> Any blog entry is also broadcasted on twitter now.
> 
> Let's also see if we can have a newsletter for the release category.
> 
> - Mario
> 
> 
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Mario Behling <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi brother,
>>
>> I put up a wiki page here: http://wiki.lxde.org/en/Category:Releases
>>
>> Please correct it and adapt it so it suits the process.
>>
>> Questions to consider:
>> * Do we want to keep release notes in the wiki as well?
>> * Would it be a good idea to decide on a release manager for single
>> (major) components, who is the main responsible and follows up in case
>> the process slows down or so? Previously there did not seem to be a
>> need though.
>>
>> I also set up a wiki page to keep a list of releases of components.
>> Reckoned it would be a good idea:
>> http://wiki.lxde.org/en/LXDE_Releases
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Mario
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Martin Bagge / brother <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 6 Apr 2010, Christoph Wickert wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think we agreed to use a proper release process recently. This means
>>>> that releases should be announced to give translators and testers a
>>>> chance to look over them.
>>>>
>>>> Please don't release anything without testing it properly. Broken
>>>> releases are a damage to the whole LXDE project.
>>> We have gained alot of speed the last six month or so and I think the
>>> future looks bright but the lack of a proper process of things is
>>> disturbing and might jeopardize things.
>>>
>>> We have discussed this before and a good proposal was made with people
>>> agreeing to stick to it. We haven't really used it but I think we should
>>> give it another try. A proper release team and release process will ensure
>>> quality in our products and avoid shitty releases that influx on other of
>>> our products that has and will be great.
>>>
>>> A release team with a clear and _easy_ process.
>>> Using freeze periods.
>>> Release dependent components together - without long waiting.
>>>
>>> Christoph and I have already told before that we are willing to work with
>>> this process.
>>> Some of the other packagers I seem to recall in this is Andrea and Andrew,
>>> and at IRC there have been more voices raised for this.
>>> As far as I can see we can cover the major distributions package managers
>>> as front line testers and I can handle the translation errors and call for
>>> updates. As long as developers just producs code and tell us when to start
>>> the process it will float and if you don't want to engage in the release
>>> process you don't have to.
>>>
>>> When do we start? Can we have a wiki page with all the relevant steps and
>>> procedures?
>>>
>>> --
>>> brother
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Lxde-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Lxde-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list

Reply via email to