Hi,
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Andrej N. Gritsenko <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> I should admit, VALA code is simpler than pure C due to built-in GTK
> classes handling.
>
gtkmm also does this, I know anyway that while easier to write requires more
memory and being a wrapper it is slower than gtk (I confirm this after
writing
several gtk and gtkmm apps for linux embedded boards)
so it is unusable for the LXDE project.
I was overreacted about "cannot be debugged", I'm sorry. VALA doesn't
> generate binary code, it generates C code, like this:
>
> g_return_val_if_fail (_tmp18_ <= _tmp19_, NULL);
> _tmp20_ = start;
> _tmp21_ = end;
> _tmp22_ = start;
> _tmp23_ = g_strndup (((gchar*) self) + _tmp20_, (gsize) (_tmp21_ -
> _tmp22_));
> result = _tmp23_;
>
well, this is more similar to assembly than C :)
Cheers,
Giuseppe.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
_______________________________________________
Lxde-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list
