Hello!
Paul Menzel has written on Sunday, 24 August, at 12:46:
>thank you for your quick reply.
You're welcome.
>Am Sonntag, den 24.08.2014, 13:23 +0300 schrieb Andrej N. Gritsenko:
>> Paul Menzel has written on Sunday, 24 August, at 11:45:
>> >That’d be awesome considering the problems with LXDE and the
>> >current stable release Debian Wheezy, where, if I remember correctly,
>> >available newer versions with important bug fixes could not be included.
>> I would like to hear what exactly those "problems with LXDE" are? At
>> least we've pushed the most problematic part of it - PCManFM - into the
>> wheezy-backports (currently 1.1.2 is there, 1.2.2 will be pushed when it
>> reach jessie), any other can be pushed into wheezy-backports as well, you
>> just have to ask if it's required.
>Sorry, for not being clear. That is what I meant. Most users won’t use
>the backports repositories or at least it requires more effort. So what
>I meant was, that it is best to have it in the “standard” repositories
>(non-backports).
Well, that effort is just a line in /etc/apt/sources.list which is a
copy of default line where 'wheezy' is replaced with 'wheezy-backports'.
Very easy I should say. Anyway, are you aware that current LXQt will be
in stable sometime near next summer, and also it will stay there without
upgrade for another 2 years. The same "problem" as with LXDE from 3 years
ago, isn't it? And most of people either use 'testing' repo or add that
simple line into /etc/apt/sources.list anyway, therefore your reasons are
not much relevant, I'm sorry to say. :)
>Thanks,
>Paul
With best regards,
Andriy.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.
Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
_______________________________________________
Lxde-list mailing list
Lxde-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list
