Je 2011-Okt-06 je 00:10, David Woolley skribis: > It might be in common use, but shouldn't be as it creates a totally > unnecessary backwards compatibility failure. > Agreed. I don't actually think HTML5 itself is that common anyway. There are some fanboys, but generally, the HTML5 revolution isn't going to happen (no, the XHTML revolution didn't happen either, despite being big in some communities, most notably the code generated by blogs, forums, and similar tools). Almost all standards-compliant websites I see are in XHTML 1.0. I think the only place that HTML5 is going to make a dent is that people are going to start using the new functionality in non-standards-complaint pages (similar to how they did with HTML 4 and XHTML). I do mourn the demise of XHTML; it was a great opportunity to cleanup the mess of HTML, but I suppose most people like the laxness of HTML parsers.
_______________________________________________ Lynx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
