On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 07:10:27PM +0100, Krzysztof Å»elechowski wrote: > Użytkownik Thomas Dickey napisaÅ: > >On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 11:40:12PM +0100, [email protected] wrote: > >>File that you are currently viewing > >> > >> Linkname: Entry into main screen > >> URL: http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/trunk/ > >> Charset: iso-8859-1 > >> Server: Apache/2.0.52 (Red Hat) > >> Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 22:35:25 GMT > >> Last Mod: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 18:51:10 GMT > >> Owner(s): None > >> size: 2 lines > >> mode: normal > >> > >>No Links on the current page > >> > >>The document is of type text/xml, > >>it has an XSLT stylesheet attached using a PI. > >>It is displayed empty, instead of having the transformation applied. > >yes - lynx doesn't do stylesheets or javascript... > > > This is not a reason to display an empty page to the unsuspecting user.
patches welcome :-) > I think javascript is a different responsibility from stylesheets, since > the publisher must cater to browsers that do not play javascript, and > HTML contains specific provisions for that case. Or do you consider it > to be the publisherâs fault to give me text/xml? But how do you decide > whether to serve XML or HTML, if the latter possibility exists on > server? Whitelisting? Blacklisting? Accept header? But does Lynx > communicate that it does not accept text/xml? As I recall it, the choice is made on the server without providing for clients which do not implement the feature. Lynx is only displaying HTML as-is. (some page authors express similar opinions about clients that don't implement flash ;-) -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net
pgpv7p5ti6sBP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Lynx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
