Użytkownik Thomas Dickey napisał:
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 08:02:49PM +0100, Krzysztof Żelechowski wrote:
Użytkownik Thomas Dickey napisał:
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 07:26:37PM +0100, Krzysztof Żelechowski wrote:
Do you refer to any server, or WebSVN in particular? Because it
obviously need not be so, and, given the proper request headers are
provided, it would be a bug in the server script.
patches welcome ;-)
bye.
Patches to what? To WebSVN? Do you happen to be the development
manager there as well?
Lynx, of course. You have several times indicated that you see a place
where Lynx should be improved.
That is true; however, for the time being, and assuming that Lynx has
the right not to handle XML (except that Lynx should display XML as
text/plain unless the DOCTYPE says it is XHTML, recognising which in
theory requires an XML reader but I believe it can be done with a
regular expression for the typical case), it is the server that must be
patched to cater to Lynx. I was mainly trying to elicit your opinion on
the mechanism that could be used server-side to achieve that. (And it
is not just about WebSVN, but about any server that sends XML to the
client.)
Regarding a possible patch, it is significantly easier to support XML
than to support Javascript because the latter is an interactive
programming environment while the former is merely a preprocessor.
Would you prefer linking to libxml2, dynamically loading libxml2 or
using xsltproc as an external tool?
Thanks,
Chris
_______________________________________________
Lynx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
