On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Philip Webb wrote:
> anyway, gawk functions look a lot like C to me:
It doesn't matter that the syntax looks somewhat like C.
It isn't C. You'd practically have to compile the gawk interpreter
into lynx to make use of it. Well, at least a lage part of gawk I
assume. Starting with a regex library.
> where's the difficulty in incorporating that code in Lynx,
> within the kind of treatment paralleling frames which i have suggested?
Where's the advantage of that kind of 'incorporating'? Even if it
*were* C - it still operates on completely different data structures
in completely different ways. There would be very little code reuse.
So why should it be in the same program & address space?
Klaus
