On Fri, 31 Mar 2000, Vlad Harchev wrote:
> Do you think all sections (or sectioning) makes no sense or some particular
> section and its description? Please describe you ideas/opinions in more
> detail.
Yes, I know I should be more detailed. I hope I will find the time soon.
> As for now - it looks like you are describing your impression you've
> got half a year ago.
Yes, it was a while ago, but I hadn't noticed significant changes since
then. (I wasn't _sure_ it all still applies - that's why I was asking
about others' opinions. So far only Leonid and you have responded to
that - maybe nobody else cares?)
> On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Klaus Weide wrote:
> > I agree with Leonid(?), proxy stuff should have its own section.
>
> Then we will have only 4 or 5 options that fall into "internal behaviour"
> section - this confuses me.
A good indication that "internal behavior" isn't a meaningful category,
in my opinion.
Klaus
