31-Mar-2000 11:10 Vlad Harchev wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Klaus Weide wrote:
> Do you think all sections (or sectioning) makes no sense or some particular
> section and its description? Please describe you ideas/opinions in more
> detail. As for now - it looks like you are describing your impression you've
> got half a year ago.
BTW, the last sentence is right:
nothing in cattoc.html output was changed during the last year
(until my yesterday's tweaks).
...
>> > For such person category "internal behaviour" should clearly indicate that
>> > "no user servicable options inside".
>>
>> There are no options like that. Or certainly there shouldn't be.
>> If there's an option for it, then it should make sense to change
>> it, at least sometimes.
>>
>> If you mean "don't change this unless you know what you're doing" then
>> the text should say that, not something else.
> Of course I meant this.
>> > Perhaps categories' descriptions should be tweaked to make things clearer, and
>>
>> Yes, please...
>>
>> > probably "internal behaviour" should be renamed "networking and misc.
>> > options" - seems most of the settings are *proxy ones.
>>
>> Last I looked at it, it seemed "grabbag" would be more appropriate.
>>
>> I agree with Leonid(?), proxy stuff should have its own section.
> Then we will have only 4 or 5 options that fall into "internal behaviour"
> section - this confuses me.
currently 20 (after splitting out Proxy section).
To my taste, a list of sections should belong to one screen page
and each section should nearly fit into one screen page or less
(the logical grouping is more important here than a number of options).
Anyway, it is definitely better than unorganized flat 130K lynx.cfg file
(and it continue to grouth).
