On Fri, 31 Mar 2000, Leonid Pauzner wrote: > Anyway, it is definitely better than unorganized flat 130K lynx.cfg file > (and it continue to grouth). Better for what? Certainly not for actually using lynx.cfg, i.e. actually making changes. Klaus
- Re: lynx-dev Open issues Philip Webb
- lynx-dev Open issues - cont. Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev Open issues - cont. brian j pardy
- Re: lynx-dev Open issues - cont. Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev Open issues - cont. brian j pardy
- Re: lynx-dev Open issues Vlad Harchev
- Re: lynx-dev Open issues Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev Open issues Vlad Harchev
- Re: lynx-dev Open issues Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev Open issues Leonid Pauzner
- Re: lynx-dev Open issues Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev Open issues Leonid Pauzner
- Re: lynx-dev Open issues T.E.Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev Open issues Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev Open issues T.E.Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev Open issues Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev Open issues T.E.Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev Open issues Henry Nelson
- Re: lynx-dev Open issues Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev Open issues Philip Webb
- Re: lynx-dev Open issues Henry Nelson
