"Andre' Poenitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| *shrug* I can only tell you that my freshly install gcc 2.7.2.3 does not
| get it. Of course my system can (and probably is) broken in other
| places...
Hmm, that seems really weird to me. I have been using 2.7.x (form RH
5.1) uptil this spring.
And I have still done most of my development work (wrapstring,
debug_stream) on 2.7.x.
Are you telling me that <algorithm> is missing from your system?
Please Note: You have to use g++ and not gcc to get access to those
header files.
| I did - as Jean Marc already pointed out - not intend to insult anyone in
| any way. I am not even under any pressure to get LyX-1.1 compiled (I
| am
I don't hope you got the impresion that I felt insulted, there was
nothing personal in you patch so why should I. I just spoke up quite
vigoursly.
| still running 0.12 quite happily ;-)) nor would it be too difficult for
| me to get egcs running. It just happened that I was fed up by my regular
| work and decided to have a look at LyX's bleeding edge and it happened
| that I had no working egcs installed and gcc got stuck.
|
| Than I thought that it might be a good idea to tell somebody about it...
| etc ;-)
There is always something you can do to stay compatible with other
compilers. ex. using enum { foo = bar }; instead of
static const int foo = bar;
Lgb
