Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| And it is certainly not standard on other unix boxen.
And on the other boxen Gcc 2.7.x is standard?
My point still is: (if you failed to see that in my comments)
What that patch does has nothing to do with gcc 2.7.x as I have used
most of the constructs he rewrites/changes on such a system.
The only exception might be namespaces.
Lgb
- Diffs to compile lyx 1.1.x with gcc 2.7.x Anonymous
- Diffs to compile lyx 1.1.x with gcc 2.7.x Anonymous
- Re: Diffs to compile lyx 1.1.x with gcc 2.7.x Anonymous
- Re: Diffs to compile lyx 1.1.x with gcc 2.7.x Anonymous
- Re: Diffs to compile lyx 1.1.x with gcc 2.7.x Anonymous
- Re: Diffs to compile lyx 1.1.x with gcc 2.7.x Anonymous
- Re: Diffs to compile lyx 1.1.x with gcc 2.7.x Anonymous
- Re: Diffs to compile lyx 1.1.x with gcc 2.7.x Anonymous
- Re: Diffs to compile lyx 1.1.x with gcc 2.... Anonymous
- Re: Diffs to compile lyx 1.1.x with gc... Anonymous
- Re: Diffs to compile lyx 1.1.x wit... Anonymous
- Re: Diffs to compile lyx 1.1.x wit... Anonymous
- Re: Diffs to compile lyx 1.1.x with gcc 2.7.x Anonymous
- Re: Diffs to compile lyx 1.1.x with gcc 2.... Anonymous
- Re: Diffs to compile lyx 1.1.x with gc... Anonymous
- Re: Diffs to compile lyx 1.1.x wit... Anonymous
- Re: Diffs to compile lyx 1.1.x with gcc 2.7.x Anonymous
