>>>>> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> On 17-Jun-99 Lars Gullik Bj�nnes wrote: >> | Generally I think it would be a good idea if LyX could be >> compiled | with gcc-2.7.2 since this seems to be some kind of >> de-facto | standard. >> >> Only generally... In linux it is a de-facto standard to compile C >> progs and/or the _kernel_ with gcc-2.7.x, _but_ to compile C++ with >> egcs. >> Juergen> Now, now, I don't think that egcs is standard on linux Juergen> yet. We have installed about 500 linux pc's here but none of Juergen> them has egcs as they still work with libc5! And it is certainly not standard on other unix boxen. JMarc
- Diffs to compile lyx 1.1.x with gcc 2.7.x Anonymous
- Diffs to compile lyx 1.1.x with gcc 2.7.x Anonymous
- Re: Diffs to compile lyx 1.1.x with gcc 2.7.x Anonymous
- Re: Diffs to compile lyx 1.1.x with gcc 2.7.x Anonymous
- Re: Diffs to compile lyx 1.1.x with gcc 2.7.x Anonymous
- Re: Diffs to compile lyx 1.1.x with gcc 2.7.x Anonymous
- Re: Diffs to compile lyx 1.1.x with gcc 2.7.x Anonymous
- Re: Diffs to compile lyx 1.1.x with gcc 2.7.x Anonymous
- Re: Diffs to compile lyx 1.1.x with gcc 2.... Anonymous
- Re: Diffs to compile lyx 1.1.x with gc... Anonymous
- Re: Diffs to compile lyx 1.1.x wit... Anonymous
- Re: Diffs to compile lyx 1.1.x wit... Anonymous
- Re: Diffs to compile lyx 1.1.x with gcc 2.7.x Anonymous
- Re: Diffs to compile lyx 1.1.x with gcc 2.... Anonymous
- Re: Diffs to compile lyx 1.1.x with gc... Anonymous
- Re: Diffs to compile lyx 1.1.x wit... Anonymous
- Re: Diffs to compile lyx 1.1.x with gcc 2.7.x Anonymous
