On Thu, Jul 22, 1999 at 02:20:21PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "Jose" == Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> Jose> Hello all, I made some advances implementing docbook.
> 
> Jose>    * command type layouts now use a number to define their
> Jose> relative order.  This number is passed inside the latexparams
> Jose> argument as:
> 
> Jose>         LatexParam "n|other_param..."
> 
> Jose>      where n is a signed integer.
> 
> I'm not sure I understand how this works...

  Since I (we) didn't want to define a new layout tag, I have packed all
the information in LatexParam.

       The former declaration is equivalent to:

        LatexParam      "other_param..."
        LayoutDepth     n

  This is a 2 in 1, like the shampoos ;-)

  This is just a matter of not changing the present textclass syntax.

[...]
> Jose>    * This brought to my attencion the fact that linuxdoc font
> Jose> support is very poor, and comes from the 0.10 era, if not
> Jose> before. Linuxdoc supports all the fonts that lyx supports, but
> Jose> only 3 of them are implemented, and if you want to use emphasis
> Jose> instead of the emphasis style you use italic to be translate
> Jose> later for emphasis. (!?)
> 
> Jose>   It is easy to fix the problem but since this a long standing
> Jose> bug I fear that there are users relying on this behaviour so I
> Jose> will ask first in the users mailling before to procede.
> 
> It would probably be better to change it... At worse, a lyxrc variable
> could control whether one wants the old handling (but I'd rather avoid
> such a kludge).

  Ok, I will work on that. The other possibility is to insert the full
font support for linuxdoc. It is just an extension of the one that exists
now.

> Jose>   Jos� PS: I send also a patch with all the changes.
> 
> I'll apply it.
Thanks.

> JMarc

  Jos�

Reply via email to