On Thu, Jul 22, 1999 at 03:12:07PM +0000, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
> > Since I (we) didn't want to define a new layout tag, I have packed all
> > the information in LatexParam.
> >
> > The former declaration is equivalent to:
> >
> > LatexParam "other_param..."
> > LayoutDepth n
> >
> > This is a 2 in 1, like the shampoos ;-)
>
>
> It looks hack-ish...
Thanks ;-)
> You might argue with 'corporate identity', but what's wrong with a
> new tag if one is needed?
Maybe because that would defeat our purpose to have a decent timeline
for 1.2 if we add new features to 1.0?
The support for docbook should involve the less number of changes as
possible, to avoid the side-effect bugs.
This makes some sense to me ;-)
Besides we should really bet in the new horse, the old one is
becoming very tired ;-)
>
> Ok, I'd better shut up since I do not know what I am talking about (as
> usual...) ;-)
I must be even worse than you are to answer you ;-)
> Andre'
>
> PS:
>
> > > It would probably be better to change it... At worse, a lyxrc variable
> > > could control whether one wants the old handling (but I'd rather avoid
> > > such a kludge).
>
> It's a pain to have 2341 handlers for all antiques, and I think LyX is
> not yet in a state where backward compatibility is more important than short
> and clean code...
Ok, I got the message. :-)
> --
> Andre' Poenitz, TU Chemnitz, Fakultaet fuer Mathematik
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... +49 3727 58 1381
Jos�
