On Fri, 06 Aug 1999 12:05:09 +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
(my original idea of a WIndows NT (Win 32) port munched)
>The proper base for such a port would be the new development version, 1.1
>(or 1.2 when finished) as it is graphical toolkit independent.
>
>This means you don't need X anymore; possible choices for toolkits are then
>Qt (available both for Unix and Windows) or GTK+ (originally Unix, but I
>understand there is some porting effort). Choosing a toolkit also available
>in Unix reduces the added complexity of a joint code base.
There is, or at least were some years ago, a C++ class library
called Yacl. That is/was (?) open source and the supported platforms
are/were Motif (UNIX), Windows NT and OS/2 at least.
I do not know the current state of Yacl, however.
>BTW I think a more native Windows port would find a market and be fine
>advertising for open source.
Well, at least we would start using it at once... :-)
Best regards,
Jarmo Ahonen
_____________________________________________________________________
Jarmo J Ahonen, PhD, Director Inf. Tech. Research Inst. (ITRI)
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Jyvaskyla
phone: +358 (0)14 603 021 P.O.Box 35
fax: +358 (0)14 602 544 40351 Jyvaskyla, FINLAND
