On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 12:45:25PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>>>>>"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >Abdelrazak> Don't you think that this is a waste of CPU cycles? The > >Abdelrazak> update machinery is done anyway because this > >Abdelrazak> LyXText::setLayout() method is called only twice in two > >Abdelrazak> LFUNs in text3.C: LFUN_FLOAT_LIST and LFUN_LAYOUT. > > > >Considering the amount of CPU cycles that may be wasted here > >(negligible), we should choose the solution which leads to the safest > >and easier to understand code, and not worry about performance. > > Well, I don't think it is any easier to understand. Have you tried to > run LyX step by step through a debugger?
None of the old hats evr had simply because 'stepping through lots of code in the debugger' is not exactly encouraged by e.g. gdb. Andre'
