> > can you be more verbose what you mean or give me some link ? somehow i'm
> > reluctant to believe that mutt would break any RFC.
> >
> > pavel
>
> http://marc.info/?t=118354353000003&r=1&w=2
>
> especially http://marc.info/?l=lyx-devel&m=118366121102662&w=2
>
> I would not blame mutt, but a line may be needed to muttrc to change
> the way it handles pure-text attachments.
when i look on my raw message in mailbox i see :
--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="n.patch"
......
with corresponding Content-Type boundary in header.
so its not inlined. i took the survey with the results that
gmane and mail-list doesnt identify that while marc does.
i will reread the thread from links above.
pavel
