On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 07:28:40PM -0400, RGH wrote: > Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > >Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > > > > > >>Well, I personally think that by supporting this rare and absolutely not > >>useful use case we will shoot our foot ourself. > >> > > > >OK, here's a more useful one: > > > >"<foo>this is my text</foo>" > >select "is my", hit "none" > >"<foo>this</foo> is my <foo>text</foo>" > > > >Do you really want to force users to > >- dissolve everything, > >- select "this" > >- hit "foo" > >- select "text" > >- hit "foo" > >to get to this result? > > > My own view would be that this kind of case should be supported, but > that it is not top priority. The implementation shouldn't make this > impossible, but if it's hard to do right now, we can sort it out later. > > Richard
I'm sure it can be supported... the code should just automate the manual process. Could be a lot of code, for something of limited value, and with a definite potential for obfuscation. - Martin
