Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
No, hence my idea of one word per inset. The fact that there is more
than one inset will only be visible if the cursor is in or if you hover
the mouse over it.
What are your criteria for something being a "word"? I.e., does your
approach handle cases like:
"\noun[Peter}'s patch \command{\define}s some new \program{LyX}-friendly
\command{environtment}s in a \noun{Knuth}ian way"?
Just as an example, this is what I'd like to type to get the above
results. It would be similar to the way you type in mathed. This assumes
that '\' is automatically recognized as a macro, if some really wants
the '\' characters he will have to type it twice; I know this will never
be accepted by OO/MS Word refugies but anyway:
\noun<space>Peter<space>}'s<space>patch<space>\command\define<space>s
<space>some<space>new<space>\program<space>LyX<space>-friendly<space>
\command<space>environtment<space>s<space>in<space>a<space>\noun<space>
Knuth<space>ian<space>way?
Abdel.
