On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 09:22:15AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > > > >> No, hence my idea of one word per inset. The fact that there is more > >> than one inset will only be visible if the cursor is in or if you hover > >> the mouse over it. > > > > What are your criteria for something being a "word"? > > I also think this notion of word is too complicated and will not > work.
Actually I played a bit with this notion too... it will become problematic. If it is meant as a solution to the problem (?) of too long charstyle insets, then IMO we must look for fundamental solutions instead. Either the three-box model, or Alfredo's idea of teaching the text inset inside to be part of the surrounding paragraph for line-breaking. Neither sounds easy (and as I said before, it does not appear to be a high priority issue as charsets are typically one word or a couple of words only.) - Martin
