Am 28.09.2010 um 14:28 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: > Stephan Witt wrote: >> >> The "replace" operation itself I didn't touch. > > OK. Then there should be no problem. > >> AFAIKS, the behavior you describe is currently not implemented. >> Or as endless loop and you're describing the problem I want to solve >> with other words... > > I don't think so. And the behaviour is implemented. Here's an example:
I see. You really meant "replace"... > No, I think we talk of two different things. As far as I can see, your > approach looks sane. Then I'll commit it soon, thanks. Stephan
