On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Abdelrazak Younes <you...@lyx.org> wrote: > I would be glad if we could be more liberal indeed. But then we would also > need bug fixing only releases. If you allow some new big features at one > point, say 2.0.2 and then declare that 2.0.3 will only be about bug fixing > because of instability introduced in 2.0.2, then the version numbers will be > very confusing to the users. 2.0.x should really be only about bug fixing... > One possibility is to use the Xfce numbering scheme: odd for development releases and even for stable releases. For example, 2.0.0 is the major stable release, 2.0.2 is the minor stable release, 2.0.3 is the minor development release.
But I'm not sure it would work in the context of LyX releases. Liviu -- Do you know how to read? http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reader Do you know how to write? http://garbl.home.comcast.net/~garbl/stylemanual/e.htm#e-mail
