> I'd rather have the real lyxfunc the the correct paramters from the
> beginning, and have a wrapper that create those argumetns from the
> supplied stream.
>  ...
> | If there really was a performance problem (which I seriously doubt) the
> | lyxfunc could come as a "core" function taking the correct arguments and a
> | wrapper, that reads the stream and feeds the core function. Other core
> | functions could use the "fast" interface.
> 

Forget my last mail. I am just a bit slow. Currently I think we mean
exactly the same kind of architecture.

Andre'

-- 
André Pönitz ........................................ [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to