Le 24/10/2016 à 01:00, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 11:52:55PM +0200, Guillaume Munch wrote:

The code does look fragile to me. I do not think that asking that
developers care about maintainability is being overzealous. Then, maybe
I am mistaken about the code and you got to something found maintainable
enough after thinking about it a lot, such that you did not feel the
need asking for advice. In that case, maybe all the misunderstandings
comes indeed from a different appreciation of what effort is asked.

But to know this we would need to speak about the code. Every time I
want to discuss your commits, I know that you are going to take things
personally, to the point that sometimes I just prefer to let it off
before even asking. I do not know another LyX developer who reacts like
you do.

It's not what you say but how you say it.

Before arguing that I am not the official maintainer, ask yourself who
was the only one who tested several of your big changes and spent a lot
of time writing detailed testcases (lots of them!)? And where would LyX
be if I had not?

I think you have an enormous ego and presumptuous manners.
I have nothing more to add to this discussion. Good bye.


Yeah, I see how this comes across, this is not what I meant, does not
correspond to what I think, and I regret writing this. The discussion
went nowhere I wanted and I regret starting it. I will no longer send
such messages to the list in the future.


Reply via email to