On Sun, Aug 03, 2025 at 01:18:52AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Sat, Aug 02, 2025 at 09:12:24PM +0200, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > On Sat, Aug 02, 2025 at 12:38:48PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > > > By the way, for the next development cycle (2.6) we might add a "Local > > > Symbols" panel (similar to the "Local Layout" panel) to the document > > > settings to add definitions that would otherwise be placed in the symbols > > > file. This way, they would be valid for the current document, and the > > > document would compile without errors due to missing information about > > > required packages, even on other computers or when using a different user > > > directory. > > > > I know knowing about this, but would it be a bad idea to actually > > directly use the Local Layout? i.e., define a new tag that allows users > > to define new symbols? > > I think there will be a lot of time for discussing details. For now, let's > concentrate on getting 2.5 in good shape ;-)
Sounds good :) Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org https://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
