>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I just wonder why this
Lars> had worked before for everybody:
Lars> Because nobody has used lyxstring for a long, long time.
Lars> There are no automatic conversion from basic_string<> to
Lars> lyxstring.
Just to satisfy my curiosity, would something like that work?
lyxstring::lyxstring(std::string const &str)
{
//what should I put here? Can I call the char const * constructor?
}
Of course, one has to #include <string> always to make it work, and
this could be costly. Would the following hack work?
template<class strclass>
lyxstring::lyxstring(T const &str)
{
// use str.c_str() here, which will break of course if T is not
// std::string...
}
JMarc
