>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Perhaps, but I do not want it. (and your T has to be renamed to
Lars> strclass)
Lars> and instead of the STRCONV(), you would need a string(). So what
Lars> did you really gain? (except hiding the ugly conversion)
Why would we need this? I have never seen that we need
str = string("foo");
instead of
str = "foo";
So what's the problem here?
JMarc
