Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I just wonder why this
| Lars> had worked before for everybody:
|
| Lars> Because nobody has used lyxstring for a long, long time.
|
| Lars> There are no automatic conversion from basic_string<> to
| Lars> lyxstring.
|
| Just to satisfy my curiosity, would something like that work?
|
| lyxstring::lyxstring(std::string const &str)
| {
| //what should I put here? Can I call the char const * constructor?
| }
|
| Of course, one has to #include <string> always to make it work, and
| this could be costly. Would the following hack work?
|
| template<class strclass>
| lyxstring::lyxstring(T const &str)
| {
| // use str.c_str() here, which will break of course if T is not
| // std::string...
| }
Perhaps, but I do not want it. (and your T has to be renamed to strclass)
and instead of the STRCONV(), you would need a string(). So what did
you really gain?
(except hiding the ugly conversion)
--
Lgb
