On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 04:48:31PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > | I don't think anybody would grieve for the loss of DEPM, as initiates > | into its ways know it. I would say: GO FOR IT. I bet it's not even > | mega-hard ! > > depm is not the complexity that I would work to remove first. I'd > rather try to get rid of the hardcoded label stuff....
How do we do that ? > | > Then you need several lyxtexts (all sharing the same buffer), because a > | > lyxtext depends on the size of the view. > | > | That's a very good point :) > > Rember that a given lyxtext can move between views, if the views have > the same with. The cache ? So lets not do that if it's complicating the code everywhere. Why is moving lyxtexts useful ? john
